Comments that an employee was to be replaced by a "young, fit blonde" were age discrimination.
What is the correct approach to take when identifying comparators in an age discrimination claim? The Court of Appeal has decided.
Danish law which gave 3 years pay to civil servants, but not those of pensionable age, was age discrimination.
Pension scheme that paid more to older people could be justified
Mr Shiret, a 55 year old banker, was made redundant but his 35 year old colleague kept his job. Was this age discrimination?
An appeal over a "shambolic" redundancy selection process fails. A terrible process does not mean that it is age discrimination.
Reducing hours of older worker was age discrimination
An ET upholds a Parking Adjudicator's age discrimination claim over his retirement.
Calling an 18 year old a “teenager” was, despite being factually accurate, an age discriminatory comment as it was used in a derogatory way.
The ET finds no discrimination when decision maker didn't discriminate, but was influenced by others who might have discriminated.
Refusing employment to 77 year old man because normal insurance provider wouldn't cover him was age discrimination.
The EAT decides that the Equality Act provides NO remedy for post termination victimisation.
A cut off of 55 for PHI payments was direct and indirect age discrimination.
Mr Homer wins his age discrimination claim (finally).
This case looks at differences in severance payments on voluntary redundancy in the Civil Service between younger and older leavers.
Telling employee "you're too old!" was direct age discrimination.
This case concerns the public sector equality duty under s.149 of the Equality Acty 2010.
A provision which reduced compensation for workers aged over 54 by taking into account the earliest date from which they could receive a state pension, was not unlawful age discrimination.
Discriminatory they were - describing someone as "Yoda" was age discrimination
The EAT upheld the decision of an ET that an age discrimination claim centring around the contention that a benefit payable under an insurance contract was due to terminate at 65 was "a little short of absurd"