Killen v Brunel Univeresity

The EAT overturned a ruling that an employee suffered age discrimination when a younger, less qualified person was appointed to a position in a redundancy situation.

Jessemey v Rowstock

The Court of Appeal clarifies an important point of law: post employment victimisation IS covered by the Equality Act 2010.

Shiret v Credit Suisse

Mr Shiret, a 55 year old banker, was made redundant but his 35 year old colleague kept his job. Was this age discrimination?

Roberts v Cash Zone

Calling an 18 year old a “teenager” was, despite being factually accurate, an age discriminatory comment as it was used in a derogatory way.

Reynolds v CLFIS

The ET finds no discrimination when decision maker didn't discriminate, but was influenced by others who might have discriminated.

Jessemey v Rowstock

The EAT decides that the Equality Act provides NO remedy for post termination victimisation.

Whitham v Capita

A cut off of 55 for PHI payments was direct and indirect age discrimination.