Mr Homer wins his age discrimination claim (finally).

This case concerns the public sector equality duty under s.149 of the Equality Acty 2010.

An employment tribunal reject an age discrimination claim on the basis that there was no "less faovurable treatment".

The Supreme Court held that an employer was guilty of indirect age discrimination by making attainment of a higher pay grade dependent on having a law degree. The case has been remitted to the ET to decide if this age discrimination was justified.

A maths teacher is unsuccessful in his age discrimination claims.

Councils breach equality duties over library closures.

The EAT rules that indirect age discrimination in a cost based selection procedure was justified.

An 18 year old who was fired for claiming minimum wage was fired.

In this case, an ET decides that a legal adviser salary band was not indirectly age discriminatory.

In an interim hearing, an Employment Tribunal finds that the test in Regulation 32(2) of the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 is a mix of objective and subjective tests.