Viewing entries in

ABN Amro and others v Hogben

A change from one policy to another policy cannot in itself be a provision, criterion or practice for the purposes of the Age Regulations.

Live Nation (Venues) UK Ltd v Hussain

The EAT found that a manager's dismissal of an employee, based on a belief that the employee held ageist views, did not justify an inference that the employee had been dismissed by reason of his age.

Standard Life Bank Ltd v Wilson

This is a decision of the Scottish Division of the EAT concerning the construction of Regulation 24 of the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006.

Cross and others v British Airways plc

The financial cost to a private employer of avoiding an indirectly discriminatory provision will not, on its own, be a good enough justification.