In this case, the Court of Appeal ruled that a good leaver provision in an LTIP could be objectively justified on the basis that the employer wished to achieve intergenerational fairness and consistency, reward experience and loyalty, and ensure a mix of generations of staff.
Viewing entries tagged
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has dismissed an appeal by the Government against a decision that transitional provisions in a judicial pension scheme were unlawfully discriminatory.
There was no finding of age discrimination after bar and waiting staff were replaced with new ones that better fit a "modern and trendy" image.
The ECJ has held that EU law setting an age limit of 65 years old for pilots was not age discriminatory and was justified.
The Court of Appeal says that it was not discrimination to force Police Officers to retire.
Italian law requires "on call contracts" (zero hours contracts) to be subject to objective conditions, unless the worker is either under 25 years of age or over 45 years of age. This case considered whether this law is age discriminatory.
An employment tribunal has ruled in favour of 200 judges whose pension entitlements were cut and found unjustified age discrimination.
The ECJ has ruled that a police force was justified in setting an age limit of 35 years old for new recruits.
University criteria that restricted appointment to a post was justified indirect age discrimination.
The EAT found an error in the ET's reasoning when looking at justification, so remitted the case for rehearing.
The ECJ rules that it was not discrimination to withhold a 10% termination payment to a "young person" but make that payment to older persons.
Army rules require longer service for those who join as minors. Is this age discrimination?
EAT says the 'A19' policy which forced police officers to retire was not age discrimination.
An enhanced redundancy scheme that tapered down to zero at age 65 was not justified.
This case relates to the retirement age for cricket officials.
The EAT holds that a change to new terms after a TUPE transfer was a PCP.
The ECJ has found Austrian civil service pension law to be objectively justified.
A retirement age of 70 years old for judges was objectively justified.
An Employment Tribunal erred when it held a PhD requirement put applicants for a lecture position at a particular disadvantage
The ECJ rules that an age limit of 30 for recruits as local police officers in Spain was unjustified age discrimination.